Before the launch of a web app, its testing is crucial. The developers must test web apps to ensure their proper functioning as per the users’ requirements. To ensure enriched user satisfaction and web app testing, the developers use a combination of various tools and frameworks. Among various available frameworks, two of the most common are Cypress vs Playwright. Both of these test automation frameworks are open-source and support automated app testing. Cypress supports JavaScript while Playwright supports several languages such as JavaScript, Java, Python, and .NET C#.
So, how should businesses choose the best framework? In this blog, let’s do a detailed comparison of Cypress vs Playwright and finalize the framework that best suits your automation needs.
What is the Playwright Framework?
Playwright framework is an open-source, Nodejs-based automation framework preferred for end-to-end testing. Microsoft develops and maintains the Playwright framework and this framework is run across various browser engines including Chromium, Webkit, and Firefox.
Additionally, Playwright allows doing author tests in several languages. Since it gets support for Typescript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, and Java, Playwright has become the most versatile tool out there.
Playwright Framework: Key Features
The playwright framework offers the following features:
- It creates scenarios spanning across various pages and domains.
- It intercepts network activity to stub and mocks the network requests.
- It is used to download and upload files.
- It permits cross-browser web automation.
- Playwright is used mainly with CI/CD servers such as Jenkins, TravisCI, CircleCI, Appveyor, GitHub Actions, etc.
- It streamlines things from the start by introducing intelligence defaults.
All About Cypress Framework
Cypress, which supports JavaScript and Mocha test framework, is used by the developers to test web applications. It follows a different approach as compared to other existing testing tools. While running a script inside the browser, the script is executed in the same loop as your application. In case you have some cases that need to be run outside the browser, Cypress uses the Node.js server for managing it.
It provides consistency as it can understand everything that happens inside and outside the browser.
Cypress Framework: Key Skills
This framework consists of the following features:
- It provides real-time debugging of apps by taking snapshots
- With Cypress network, one can control, stub, and test edge cases easily without any requirement of a server
- It features mocking and stubbing capabilities.
- Tests are written in JavaScript
- Cypress doesn’t use Selenium or WebDriver, so it provides fast, consistent, and accurate tests.
Primary Differences: Cypress vs Playwright
Our team of experts has compared Cypress vs Playwright regarding its features, performance, support, open source, etc. to provide a detailed insight about both.
| Basis | Playwright | Cypress |
| Language | It supports multiple languages like JavaScript, Java, Python, and .NET C# | It only supports JavaScript. |
| Test Runner Frameworks Supported | Mocha, Jasmine, and Jest | Mocha |
| Supporting Operating Systems | Windows, Linux, and macOS | Windows, Linux, and macOS 10.9 and above |
| Open Source | It is free and an open-source | Same |
| Architecture | Headless Browser with event-driven architecture | Executes test cases directly inside the browser |
| Supporting Browsers | Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit | Chrome, Firefox, and Edge |
| Support | The playwright is relatively new so presently has limited support from the community as compared to others | It has vast community support from professionals worldwide. |
| Real Devices Support | It won’t support real devices for mobile browser tests; however, it supports emulators | It supports both, real device cloud and remote servers. |
| Architecture | It is single-threaded, and has in-built queuing | Same |
Key Similarities: Cypress & Playwright
- Cypress and Playwright are two open-source, JavaScript-based libraries used for automating end-to-end tests. These automation frameworks provide a single API that is used by the developers and testers to interact with web applications across various browser engines.
- Because both of them have the ability to do tests and interactions in Firefox and Chromium browsers, they are quite similar. From taking screenshots to stubbing out requests, and testing on different screen sizes, both of them do these tasks.
- The developers looking for a continuous integration flow or prefer to run them without a UI interface can use either Cypress or Playwright.
Cypress vs Playwright: Key Differences
Though both of these test automation frameworks aim to solve the same issue, they have different ways of doing so.
- Both of these frameworks have different ways of running tests but Playwright’s promise-based system can support several browsers and users’ contexts simultaneously.
- Due to this, Playwright becomes more flexible and efficient as compared to Cypress, so it needs to be re-run for each different browser option.
Which One is Right For Your Project: Cypress vs Playwright? Consult Kodehash Technologies
In the debate between Cypress vs Playwright, the final decision must be taken after considering the specific testing requirements and the kind of your web application. Playwright’s dynamic nature and multi-browser support make it ideal for comprehensive cross-browser testing across various domains. Cypress is proficient in front-end testing, offering exceptional documentation and an interactive debugging experience. Ultimately, the decision must be taken by the experts aligning with the project’s needs and team’s expertise.
The QA team at Kodehash Technologies has completed numerous software development projects offering test automation services to our customers. So, while choosing a testing framework, we give top priority to functionality.
How are we Different From Our Competitors?
- We do detailed test coverage across multiple platforms and devices.
- We deploy testing methodologies for quick and accurate product development cycles.
- We tailor test strategies as per the client’s specific needs and requirements.
- We deploy dynamic automation frameworks for accelerated testing and enhanced efficiency
- Our team of experienced QA professionals leaves no stone untouched in giving the best results.
- We rigorously do performance testing to ensure the scalability and reliability of software applications
- Selecting the right testing tool for your web app is important to streamline the entire testing procedure.
Connect with the experts at Kodehash Technologies who will choose the right tool based on usage and functionality to ensure a higher ROI.